Updated climate models clouded by scientific biases, researchers find


The cloudy Southern Ocean shows an improved radiative budget in the latest IPCC climate models, but there are still significant biases in the simulated physical properties of the clouds over the SE. These prejudices are largely reversed when they influence together

How does the Southern Ocean and its relationship to clouds contribute to climate change?

BEIJING, CHINA, Sept. 20, 2022 /EINPresswire.com/ — Clouds can cool or warm the planet’s surface, a radiative effect that contributes significantly to the global energy balance and can be altered by human-caused pollution. The world’s southernmost ocean, aptly named the Southern Ocean and far from human pollution but exposed to abundant sea gases and aerosols, is about 80% covered by clouds. How does this body of water and its relationship to clouds contribute to the changing world climate?

Researchers are still working to find out, and they’re now one step closer thanks to an international collaboration identifying compensation errors in widely used climate modeling protocols, known as CMIP6. They published their findings Sept. 20 in Advances in Atmospheric Sciences.

“Cloud and radiative distortions over the Southern Ocean have been a long-standing problem in past generations of global climate models,” said corresponding author Yuan Wang, now an associate professor in Purdue University’s Department of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences. “After the latest CMIP6 models were released, we were curious to see how they perform and if the old issues are still there.”

Also Read :  Updated climate models are clouded by scientific biases, researchers find

CMIP6, a project of the World Climate Research Program, enables the systematic evaluation of climate models in order to clarify their comparability with real data. In this study, Wang and the researchers analyzed five of the CMIP6 models to serve as standard references.

Wang said the researchers are also motivated by other studies in the field, which point to Southern Ocean cloud cover as a factor contributing to the high sensitivity of some CMIP6 models when the simulations predict a surface temperature that is responsible for the rate of increased Radiation increases too quickly. In other words, if improperly simulated, Southern Ocean clouds can cast a shadow of doubt on projections of future climate change.

“This paper emphasizes the compensation for errors in the physical properties of clouds despite the overall improvement in radiative simulation over the Southern Ocean,” Wang said. “With space satellite observations, we are able to quantify these errors in the simulated microphysical cloud properties, including cloud fraction, cloud water content, cloud droplet size and more, and further show how each contributes to the overall distortion of the cloud radiative effect.” ”

Also Read :  Physics Nobel recognizes UC Berkeley experiment on ‘spooky action at a distance’

The cloud radiative effect — how clouds interfere with radiation to heat or cool the surface — is largely determined by the physical properties of the cloud. “Cloud radiative effects in CMIP6 are comparable to satellite observations, but we found that there are large compensating distortions in the cloud fraction liquid path and effective droplet radius,” Wang said. “The main implication is that although the latest CMIP models improve the simulation of their mean states, such as B. Radiant fluxes at the top of the atmosphere, the detailed cloud processes are still of great uncertainty.”

According to Wang, this discrepancy also partly explains why the model’s climate sensitivity ratings don’t fare so well, since those ratings rely on the detailed physics of the model — rather than mean state performance — to assess the overall impact on climate.

“Our future work will aim to identify individual parameterizations responsible for these distortions,” Wang said. “Hopefully we can work closely with model developers to solve them. Finally, the ultimate goal of any model validation study is to help improve those models.”

Also Read :  Chinese, US scientists celebrate pioneering female physicist

Additional contributors are Lijun Zhao and Yuk L. Yung, Division of Geology and Planetary Science, California Institute of Technology; Chuanfeng Zhao, Institute of Atmospheric and Ocean Sciences, Faculty of Physics, Peking University; and Xiquan Dong, Department of Hydrology and Atmospheric Sciences, University of Arizona.

Jenny Lin
Advances in atmospheric science
[email protected]
Visit us on social media:
Facebook
Twitter





Source link